<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More Web Inspector Updates</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.webkit.org/blog/1091/more-web-inspector-updates/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.webkit.org/blog/1091/more-web-inspector-updates/</link>
	<description>All about WebKit development</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 11:34:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: dak</title>
		<link>http://www.webkit.org/blog/1091/more-web-inspector-updates/comment-page-1/#comment-25295</link>
		<dc:creator>dak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Apr 2010 22:38:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webkit.org/blog/?p=1091#comment-25295</guid>
		<description>For some reason in Audit I am always getting the following error for all images:
Specify image dimensions: &quot;A width and height should be specified for all images in order to speed up page display. The following image(s) are missing a width and/or height:&quot;

This isn&#039;t just for my web site but for any site I check (including apple.com and webkit.org).  All of the images, however, actually do have width and height specified in html.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For some reason in Audit I am always getting the following error for all images:<br />
Specify image dimensions: &#8220;A width and height should be specified for all images in order to speed up page display. The following image(s) are missing a width and/or height:&#8221;</p>
<p>This isn&#8217;t just for my web site but for any site I check (including apple.com and webkit.org).  All of the images, however, actually do have width and height specified in html.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alkaba222's me2DAY</title>
		<link>http://www.webkit.org/blog/1091/more-web-inspector-updates/comment-page-1/#comment-25294</link>
		<dc:creator>alkaba222's me2DAY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Apr 2010 02:28:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webkit.org/blog/?p=1091#comment-25294</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;맥스제로이쉐뀌의 생각...&lt;/strong&gt;

오오…사파리  Inspector Updates …….Timeline Panel 추가됬넹..후후 ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>맥스제로이쉐뀌의 생각&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>오오…사파리  Inspector Updates …….Timeline Panel 추가됬넹..후후 &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lensco</title>
		<link>http://www.webkit.org/blog/1091/more-web-inspector-updates/comment-page-1/#comment-25293</link>
		<dc:creator>lensco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Apr 2010 15:27:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webkit.org/blog/?p=1091#comment-25293</guid>
		<description>Really nice updates. I started writing a comment however about how I think Firebug is still superior for web designers, but it got a bit lengthy so I turned it into a blog post:

http://lensco.be/2010/04/15/webkit-inspector-wish-list/

What do you guys think?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really nice updates. I started writing a comment however about how I think Firebug is still superior for web designers, but it got a bit lengthy so I turned it into a blog post:</p>
<p><a href="http://lensco.be/2010/04/15/webkit-inspector-wish-list/" rel="nofollow">http://lensco.be/2010/04/15/webkit-inspector-wish-list/</a></p>
<p>What do you guys think?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ray Drainville</title>
		<link>http://www.webkit.org/blog/1091/more-web-inspector-updates/comment-page-1/#comment-25292</link>
		<dc:creator>Ray Drainville</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Apr 2010 09:14:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webkit.org/blog/?p=1091#comment-25292</guid>
		<description>This looks like a really useful update to the inspector, thank you very much :)

One addition that could be useful would be a built-in tidy engine, to verify that we&#039;re building standards-compliant sites. Before 64-bit goodness stopped the fun, I was a big fan of Safari Tidy:

http://zappatic.net/safaritidy/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This looks like a really useful update to the inspector, thank you very much <img src='http://www.webkit.org/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>One addition that could be useful would be a built-in tidy engine, to verify that we&#8217;re building standards-compliant sites. Before 64-bit goodness stopped the fun, I was a big fan of Safari Tidy:</p>
<p><a href="http://zappatic.net/safaritidy/" rel="nofollow">http://zappatic.net/safaritidy/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven Roussey</title>
		<link>http://www.webkit.org/blog/1091/more-web-inspector-updates/comment-page-1/#comment-25291</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven Roussey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Apr 2010 02:02:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webkit.org/blog/?p=1091#comment-25291</guid>
		<description>Awesome work!

Where is a &quot;quick-start&quot; guide to working on the inspector?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awesome work!</p>
<p>Where is a &#8220;quick-start&#8221; guide to working on the inspector?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jweber</title>
		<link>http://www.webkit.org/blog/1091/more-web-inspector-updates/comment-page-1/#comment-25290</link>
		<dc:creator>jweber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Apr 2010 00:54:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webkit.org/blog/?p=1091#comment-25290</guid>
		<description>&gt; We have also worked on scalability all over the inspector.

This is huge. I find the Resources and Scripts panels almost unusable in the current version of Safari, because they can&#039;t handle large files. But I&#039;m playing around with the latest release of Chrome, which seems to include these changes, and it&#039;s MUCH better. I haven&#039;t noticed any problems so far, even with my 800K JavaScript files.

Great job!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt; We have also worked on scalability all over the inspector.</p>
<p>This is huge. I find the Resources and Scripts panels almost unusable in the current version of Safari, because they can&#8217;t handle large files. But I&#8217;m playing around with the latest release of Chrome, which seems to include these changes, and it&#8217;s MUCH better. I haven&#8217;t noticed any problems so far, even with my 800K JavaScript files.</p>
<p>Great job!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: charleshimmer</title>
		<link>http://www.webkit.org/blog/1091/more-web-inspector-updates/comment-page-1/#comment-25289</link>
		<dc:creator>charleshimmer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 2010 16:52:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webkit.org/blog/?p=1091#comment-25289</guid>
		<description>I was really excited to see you can now see the form data posted in an ajax request!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was really excited to see you can now see the form data posted in an ajax request!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bobspryn</title>
		<link>http://www.webkit.org/blog/1091/more-web-inspector-updates/comment-page-1/#comment-25288</link>
		<dc:creator>bobspryn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 2010 16:44:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webkit.org/blog/?p=1091#comment-25288</guid>
		<description>Love it all. The biggest thing I&#039;m waiting for is a shortcut that pops open the inspector and puts it in inspection mode (magnifying glass) so that I can quickly hit that keyboard shortcut and select something to inspect. Right now I can right-click inspect, but its quite a bit slower.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Love it all. The biggest thing I&#8217;m waiting for is a shortcut that pops open the inspector and puts it in inspection mode (magnifying glass) so that I can quickly hit that keyboard shortcut and select something to inspect. Right now I can right-click inspect, but its quite a bit slower.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CyberSkull</title>
		<link>http://www.webkit.org/blog/1091/more-web-inspector-updates/comment-page-1/#comment-25287</link>
		<dc:creator>CyberSkull</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 2010 05:11:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webkit.org/blog/?p=1091#comment-25287</guid>
		<description>Are there any plans to do any native building of the inspector?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are there any plans to do any native building of the inspector?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hawkman</title>
		<link>http://www.webkit.org/blog/1091/more-web-inspector-updates/comment-page-1/#comment-25286</link>
		<dc:creator>hawkman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 2010 01:16:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webkit.org/blog/?p=1091#comment-25286</guid>
		<description>Really excited by the Styles improvements — viewing inherited styles is going to be exceptionally useful — and both Timeline and Audits look like they could be very handy. Wow, guys.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really excited by the Styles improvements — viewing inherited styles is going to be exceptionally useful — and both Timeline and Audits look like they could be very handy. Wow, guys.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

